Clarion Housing Group customers are unhappy with the better

Based on our analysis, we suggest Clarion Housing Group use materials of better quality when building and improve workmanship. Also, improve property maintenance and prioritize health risks so that the service charges are worth it.

Caption of a family looking at a house for sale.
Photo: Mark Moz

Property maintenance

Average grade: 1,06 / 5
Occurrence rate: 21%
Some complained about the properties being in bad shape, full of black mold, and other safety risks. Also, poor building and workmanship.



Price

Average grade: 1,00 / 5
Occurrence rate: 17%
Some claimed the service charges to be overpriced and that the association does nothing to improve the properties.

Quality

Average grade: 1,00 / 5
Occurrence rate: 2%
It seems that some were shocked by the shoddy workmanship and poor quality materials used.

Caption of the topic “property maintenance” in Gavagai Explorer.

The research team at Gavagai performed this analysis using our AI-powered text analysis tool, Gavagai Explorer. All texts analyzed in this article are collected from public online data published on TrustPilot.

Want to try this kind of analysis on your own data?

Gavagai Explorer is free to try (no credit card needed) and works in 46 languages.

Book a demo to find out more!