Naukrigulf should deal with the fake accounts

Caption of a keyboard with a button that says “hiring”.
Photo: Mike Lawrence

Insight nr. Ⅰ
The topic “interviews” occurred in 2% of the reviews and has an average grade of 3,27 / 5. It was mentioned that some users never received any calls for job interviews. This could be because some of the job posts are fake.



Insight nr. Ⅱ
The topic “response” occurred in 5% of the reviews and has an average grade of 3,14 / 5. Some complained about not getting any responses from recruiters. It seemed as if employers hadn’t reviewed their applications at all.

Insight nr. Ⅲ
The topic “profile data” occurred in 2% of the reviews and has an average grade of 2,94 / 5. It was mentioned that it’s sometimes problematic to update your profile and CVs. In some cases, users needed to repeatedly provide the same information when applying for jobs.

Caption of the topic “interviews” from the dashboard of this analysis.

A simple checklist for Naukrigulf

Based on our analysis, we have three clear suggestions for Naukrigulf;

  1. Consider adding a feature to store basic personal information for the next job application, which would make it less time-consuming to fill in the information.
  2. Verify the accounts to avoid fake posts.
  3. Find a solution to increase the number of responses from recruiters.


The research team at Gavagai performed this analysis using our AI-powered text analysis tool, Gavagai Explorer. All texts analyzed in this article are collected from public online data published on Google Play.

Want to try this kind of analysis on your own data?

Gavagai Explorer is free to try (no credit card needed) and works in 46 languages.

Book a demo to find out more!